Friday, October 30, 2015

DNA and Indigeneity Event Explores Genomics in Archaeology and Anthropology









Victor Guerin of the Musqueam Nation opens the Simon Fraser University IPinCH DNA and Indigeneity public symposium
October 29th, 2015
(Link)

Over 70 people attended the IPinCH DNA and Indigeneity public symposium held last week in Vancouver. The symposium focused on current and prospective applications of genomics in archaeology and anthropology.

The public event was followed by a two-day invited workshop that brought together an international group of academics, practitioners, students, and community representatives from Canada, the United States, Australia, and Latin America.

The symposium began with a traditional welcome by Musqueam Nation member, Victor Guerin, followed by an introduction to the event by IPinCH Director George Nicholas.

The first session focused on the promise and perils of using genomics in constructing and interpreting Indigenous identities and featured presentations from Armand Minthorn, a religious leader and member of the Board of Trustees of the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Deborah Bolnick, Associate Professor at University of Texas at Austin, and Alan Goodman, Professor of Biological Anthropology at Hampshire College.

The second session explored the potential for genetic information to assist with the repatriation of human remains. This session included talks by Daryl Pullman, Professor of Medical Ethics at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Dorothy Lippert from the Repatriation Office at the Smithsonian Institution, and Cressida Fforde, Deputy Director of the National Centre for Indigenous Studies at the Australian National University.

The final session examined the problematic history of genetic research with Indigenous peoples before turning to the present to identify opportunities to work together “in a good way.” Kim TallBear, Associate Professor at the University of Alberta, Rosalina James, Assistant Professor at the University of Washington, and Ripan Malhi, Associate Professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, all provided their insight and experiences on this topic.

Videos of the symposium presentations will be available on the IPinCH website in the near future.

The following two-day invited workshop was an opportunity for nineteen scholars, practitioners, and community representatives to delve further into the complex issues introduced in the symposium.

One key take away message from the workshop was the need to support Indigenous peoples and other vulnerable populations around the world in their effort to secure genetic autonomy. Genetic autonomy was described by the workshop participants as the ability to control when, where, how, and by whom the genetic information of Indigenous peoples is used. To this end, it is critical that additional resources and support are provided for Indigenous peoples seeking training in genomic sciences.

Another key point of discussion at the workshop focused on clarifying misconceptions about DNA and genetic testing. In the case of the growing use of parentage testing by Native American tribes to inform enrollment decisions, for example, there is uncertainty among many tribal members about the exact purpose of these tests and how they’re different from genetic ancestry tests. This is a cause for concern and highlights the need for more clarity on what genetic testing is and what it can (or can’t) do.

Finally, there was a strong consensus among workshop participants on the need to contextualize the results of genetic research—that is, to situate genetic data within a broader cultural, historical, and political context—particularly when working with Indigenous communities. By presenting genetic information alongside other ways of interpreting the past, such as oral histories and archaeology, we ensure a more holistic, complete, and dynamic interpretation of identities—past and present.

Ultimately, genetics and ancient DNA analysis should be considered alongside other ways of understanding the identity of ancient and modern-day people. It should not take precedence but rather, in many cases, should be considered “a last resort” when all other information has been considered. For example, if there is no information on the geographic provenance or cultural affiliation of human remains, DNA analysis may provide insight into genetic relatedness at a general level.

Proposed outputs arising from the workshop include journal articles, a collection of ancient DNA case studies, a tool kit for communities considering genetic research, a travelling exhibit on DNA and Indigeneity for schools and museums, and a website housing a diverse assortment of resources.

Financial support for the event was provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) and by Simon Fraser University.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Comments have temporarily been turned off. Because I currently have a heavy workload, I do not feel that I can do an acceptable job as moderator. Thanks for your understanding.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.